Gay Marriage: My View

Posted by daycruz on July 9, 2007

It is difficult for me to deliberately write. My friend Ashish finds writing an enjoyable thing to do and seems to be able to do it daily. I am what many people could call a flake. I go on spurts of writing essays non stop then I hit a wall and, well, stop completely. In order for me to get going on writing again, I decided to start up a little debate with Ashish about gay marriage.

I shock Pentecostals frequently when I express my views on gay marriage. Before I even begin, its important that you have a background for my current viewpoint. Ask anyone who went to high school with me: I was a red-meat conservative. I was all about God, Country, and Guns. I was to the right on just about every issue from abortion to the Iraq War. Over the past few years I’ve become increasingly challenged by the holy spirit on my political and personal views. What used to be a knee-jerk response to the liberalism that surrounded me in the public school system has led to an increased awareness of the need of Christ’s love in this broken world. So, like I said, I shock Pentecostals. Not just Pentecostals, I shock most evangelical Christians. Whenever I proclaim that “People of the same sex should be allowed to marry eachother.” The response is incredible. Instantly, my sanity is questioned by those listening. The initial question always is “How can you say that gay marriage is OK?” Here is my response for the umpteenth time. I also promise you that I will be repeating this response for years to come. I don’t think gay marriage is OK. I wouldn’t marry someone of the same sex. This doesn’t mean that I have to stop others from doing it. It’s interesting to note what Ashish said about this issue:

I’m personally not sure what my stance on this issue would be. I find myself stuck in between these two approaches, grasping for a middle ground. I have to go back to what it truly means to be a Christ-follower. I have to go back to what it means to be Christ to people.

If you look through the gospels, there were always the religious leaders who kept the law down to the last letter. This law was not only the original law, but also included many more amendments. They placed the weight of this unbearable law upon the people. In doing so they also effectively made it impossible for anyone who was not a religious leader to keep it. When I think of this issue I am brought back to a time when these religious leaders brought a prostitute to the feet of Jesus and asked whether she should be stoned. Jesus realized that these religious leaders were the biggest hypocrites and illustrated to them that showing grace and not punishment is always the higher road in any situation. Jesus also illustrated to them that the worst sin of all is believing oneself to be above sin, which is in essence pride.

I recognize the example of the adulterous woman in the Gospels and see it as an extension of Christ’s word on where the personal and the public spheres converge. The religious leaders desire to public stone this woman. His response to the elders who foaming at the mouth and twiddling their fingers is so powerful that it shakes the Evangelical mindset in me. Our Lord is silent as one by one each of the religious people left until the woman and Jesus are left. What does Jesus mean when shatters the silence? “Has no one condemned thee?” I believe that Jesus is making a simple statement on the lack of authority that the society has to punish the woman.

Ashish and I seem to be on the same side in this one. In further conversations with Ashish, he said that he might vote no if the issue of legalizing gay marriage came up but that he would not consider bringing it up as an issue. I would go a few steps further and say that I might not only abstain from voting but might actually actively campaign against anyone that sought to make marriage between people of the same sex illegal. Ashish moves further along and says something here that I found powerful:

I believe that it is not the job of the Christian to mandate rules and regulations per say in society, but to illustrate Christ’s love to people. Our job is not to convict the sinner. The Holy Spirit does a pretty good job of that. Our job is to be Christ to the sinner.

Every man has sinned, we are all condemned. Jesus tells the woman to then go and “sin no more” bringing a fitting conclusion to this topic. The concept of correction with love is sorely lacking in today’s church. Rather than campaigning against giving these people rights? Can we show love to these people? Can more Christians work in areas of hospitals where a large portion of the population are gay and infected with HIV? Ashish makes the best point when he says that we have to be Christ to the sinner. It’s understandable that many Christians, including myself, are terrified at the prospect of the future. Some of us are terrified to raise kids in this current climate. I’d like to end with a simple sentence that I hope you can cling to: Christ does not change. He is the same yesterday, today, and forever. Banning gay marriage will not bring gay people to Christ, showing love to them and showering compassion and mercy on them will.

5 Responses to “Gay Marriage: My View”

  1. [...] UPDATE: read DeCruz’s response [...]

  2. Indu said

    I am glad I’m not the only one with the same thought. I wondered, “So, even if gay marriage is illegal, and if the peopls’s hearts don’t change, what is the purpose?” I felt torn because on the other side I felt guilty for compromising for not speaking up.

    Then again, there are churches out there who are fighting with the gay activists for their rights. That is approving of what the Bible is against. And there are churches out there who preach that homosexuality is not a sin. Personally, I think its either a reaction towards the modern Pharisees who make some sins more ’special’ than the other sins. Or some churches have compromised and want to please society rather than God.

    One of the accusations from the promoters of gay marriage towards the Christians against it was, “you are hypocrites for even having an opinion on this.” Its true. Look at the divorce rates and marital discord within the churches. The Christian divorce rate is almost the same as non-christian divorce rate. This is not counting the new converts who experienced divorce before salvation. The christians mentioned here are the ones who have been saved for 3+ years.

    Seriously, if all believers actually applied the teachings of Jesus into their lives, they could make a difference. But, why doesnt it happen?

    Our churches need a wake up call. Discipleship, love and serving is what will change the world. Churches today are lacking in discipleship and therefore many believers are not strong in their faith.

    Sorry this is long… But I had the same thoughts. Seriously, I wondered if I was the only Spirit-filled Christian with these thoughts. I would get reactions from others.

    But here are a couple of questions for you to add to the discussion:

    —-Do you think there would be a day when christians who say they don’t believe in homosexuality would be accused of ‘discrimination’? Of course, name-calling, harassment of a gay person is wrong and to me that is discrimination. God does not like that. If I saw anyone bully a person because he or she is gay, I would stand up for that person.

    What I am talking about is when simply mentioning what the Bible talks about homsexuality. Could the Christian or church be accused of discrimination? I am talking about churches being sued and facing lawsuits (not personal accusations)

    Gay marriages are one thing. But what about giving homosexuals a minority status?

  3. daycruz said

    Indu, you make a very good point. And to answer your question, there are many spirit filled Christians who feel the same way as I do but they are afraid to speak out about it for fear of being ostracized. In response to whether Christians who don’t believe in homosexuality will ever be accused of discrimination: it has already happened. A preacher in a Scandinavian nation was sentenced to jail a year or two ago for saying that homosexuality was a sin. While I don’t think the preacher got any jail time, it was an interesting situation in what used to be a very religious nation. So it is entirely possible. The difference between the United States and some European nations though is the American emphasis on individual rights. These include but are not limited to: free speech, the right to bear arms, and so on and so forth. Under the current constitution, I don’t think Christians can be harassed by the government for their beliefs. On the other hand, I don’t think minority status should be handed to ANYone since I believe everyone should be treated equally.

  4. Indu said

    They need the gospel just as much. I totally agree with you on minority status. Minority status and affirmative action was needed at one point because institutional discrimination existed and was real. Not too long ago, a white teacher in maybe North Carolina(not sure which state) sued a school for racial discrimination.
    Even in Portland at a bus stop, a group of Black teens beat up a White girl. And it wasnt a coincidence, they actually said they were looking for a White person to beat up. Why should these incidents be treated any differently than if it happened the other way round?

  5. t-hype said

    Hi Daycruz!
    I am one of two people who still have dippu.com on my blogreader. ;)

    Don’t mean to be all up in your Koolaid BUT I think it’s important to make a distinction between supporting/opposing legislation and supporting/opposing people. “If you don’t agree with me, you don’t like me”–is often how things boil down in people’s minds. Opposing a governmental sanction on gay MARRIAGE is quite a different matter than saying, “All gay people are going straight to hell” which in fact, is probably not true.

    Legal arrangements between two (or more!) adults are quite another matter. Marriage on the other hand is a metaphor of Christ’s relationship with the church. The Bridegroom is coming for his Bride not “some dude”.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>